<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ImageJ vs. Pixcavator, a follow-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inperc.com/blog2/index.php/2008/03/04/imagej-vs-pixcavator-a-follow-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/04/imagej-vs-pixcavator-a-follow-up/</link>
	<description>Computer vision, image analysis, and related mathematics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mc Carthy</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/04/imagej-vs-pixcavator-a-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mc Carthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/04/imagej-vs-pixcavator-a-follow-up/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve looked at both sites Imagej and Pixcavator, there is no compparison.
Doesn&#039;t matter that imagj is free, I ran some analysis on both systems, Pixacator produced what I needed in seconds, still trying to get to grips with Imagej and no results.
Keep up the good work.

Kevin Mc Carthy
MD Technelogix Ltd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve looked at both sites Imagej and Pixcavator, there is no compparison.<br />
Doesn&#8217;t matter that imagj is free, I ran some analysis on both systems, Pixacator produced what I needed in seconds, still trying to get to grips with Imagej and no results.<br />
Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Kevin Mc Carthy<br />
MD Technelogix Ltd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

