Comments on: In response to “Computer vision and partial solutions” http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/01/20/in-response-to-computer-vision-and-partial-solutions/ Computer vision, image analysis, and related mathematics Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:25:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Peter http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/01/20/in-response-to-computer-vision-and-partial-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-67 Peter Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:02:39 +0000 http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/01/20/in-response-to-computer-vision-and-partial-solutions/#comment-67 Thanks for the feedback, Mario. "Digital conscience" is a good one! Thanks for the feedback, Mario. “Digital conscience” is a good one!

]]> By: Mario Vigliar http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/01/20/in-response-to-computer-vision-and-partial-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-66 Mario Vigliar Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:39:14 +0000 http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/01/20/in-response-to-computer-vision-and-partial-solutions/#comment-66 I think you’re right in making such a consideration. But the hope for generality is a common sense in every science that could be someway related to human being: just imagine AI, for a simple example, where we can identify a bunch of simple and singular difficult problems (taxonomy, elastic matching, contextualizing and de-contextualizing, language deformation and so on…) but AI researchers are still working to *global conscience* or *digital conscience* projects… I’m involved in Computer Vision research (mostly for industrial quality control) and also I teach Robotics/CV @ University, and the first thing I say when I start the first lesson to the class is: “PLEASE, forget to be human! When you think about your eyes, your mind and your capability to solve a problem, PLEASE, just take examples, not rules. Human capabilities to go deep in a problem and subdivide it in simpler task is a thing we haven’t still realized in silicon, so PLEASE, keep it simple and stupid!”. I wish someone had listened to my words…at least once! Compliments for your blog and other activities, I’ll follow your news more often. Bye. I think you’re right in making such a consideration. But the hope for generality is a common sense in every science that could be someway related to human being: just imagine AI, for a simple example, where we can identify a bunch of simple and singular difficult problems (taxonomy, elastic matching, contextualizing and de-contextualizing, language deformation and so on…) but AI researchers are still working to *global conscience* or *digital conscience* projects…

I’m involved in Computer Vision research (mostly for industrial quality control) and also I teach Robotics/CV @ University, and the first thing I say when I start the first lesson to the class is: “PLEASE, forget to be human! When you think about your eyes, your mind and your capability to solve a problem, PLEASE, just take examples, not rules. Human capabilities to go deep in a problem and subdivide it in simpler task is a thing we haven’t still realized in silicon, so PLEASE, keep it simple and stupid!”.

I wish someone had listened to my words…at least once!

Compliments for your blog and other activities, I’ll follow your news more often. Bye.

]]> By: Computer Vision for Dummies » Bio-Image Informatics Workshop, Santa Barbara, Jan 17-18. http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/01/20/in-response-to-computer-vision-and-partial-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-64 Computer Vision for Dummies » Bio-Image Informatics Workshop, Santa Barbara, Jan 17-18. Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:27:15 +0000 http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/01/20/in-response-to-computer-vision-and-partial-solutions/#comment-64 [...] Most image analysis methods are intended for specific problems. But each problem may have different methods applicable. No-one is concerned that the results could be also different (see last post). [...] [...] Most image analysis methods are intended for specific problems. But each problem may have different methods applicable. No-one is concerned that the results could be also different (see last post). [...]

]]>